Stem Cells for Memory

New synapses repair recall after a stem cell injection

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Stem cells have long been heralded as a potential treatment for a range of brain ailments, but research has so far focused on movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Now a new animal study shows that the immature cells could also help with cognitive impairments. Frank M. LaFerla of the University of California, Irvine, and his colleagues showed that neural stem cells can reverse memory loss.

The team manipulated the genome of mice such that they could initiate neuron death in the hippocampus by turning on specific genes. Mice whose brains were injured with this method showed significant memory impairment on place-recognition tests. After receiving an injection of neural stem cells from young mice, however, they performed as well as healthy mice did.

When the researchers tracked the stem cells in the mice’s brains, they saw that only about 5 percent of them actually developed into neurons, suggesting the cells did not rescue memory by replacing dead neurons, LaFerla says. Instead mice injected with stem cells developed a far greater number of synapses, or connections between neurons, at the damaged site than control mice did. LaFerla thinks that neurotrophins—biochemical compounds secreted by the injected stem cells—most likely were responsible for the effect. This finding could open the door for drug treatments based on these compounds. “Such a treatment would be much less risky than injecting actual cells,” he says, adding that transplanted stem cells could potentially develop into tumors.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That risk is currently a hurdle in many stem cell therapies, says Curt Freed of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver. For example, animal studies have shown that neurons derived in the lab from human embryonic stem cells improve Parkinson’s symptoms; however, any residual stem cells associated with those neurons could form masses of unwanted cells. But scientists are making progress in refining these therapies, and the first ever trial of fetal stem cells injected directly into the brain is currently under way in children with Batten disease, a rare and fatal illness of the nervous system.

Freed expects transplants of neurons derived from embryonic stem cells to enter the clinical arena soon as well. “I think Parkinson’s will be the first disease in which these cells are used, and I would say that that’s likely to happen as early as two years from now.”

SA Mind Vol 19 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Stem Cells for Memory” in SA Mind Vol. 19 No. 1 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0208-13b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe